The following is an edited version of a research project about the Trona
Strike of 1941. The original project is an “Oral History” which includes a videotaped
interview with Chuy Quezada father of the author. Considered original research on the experience of Mexican
Americans and labor issues in California, the study is now part of the Ethnic and Gender Studies
Library Collection at U. C. Santa Barbara.
Trona, California is an isolated town in the Mojave Desert where the temperature is known to
reach 125 degrees in the summer months. In 1941 it was a company town owned and run
by American Potash and Chemical Corporation. This company produced potash, boric acid and
other chemical products by processing brine drawn from the the dry salt lake, Searles Lake. In
1941 the company functioned as as combination landlord and government service agency. Here
practically everyone, including doctors, nurses, barbers, store clerks, and police officers were on
the payroll of AP&CC. Services were operated under one of two regular
departments of the company--the Village Service Department and the Mercantile Department."
(Allen)
Research shows that the seeds of discontent were growing in Trona in the 1930's. There was a
thwarted attempt to begin a union affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. The
International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Works, Local No. 414 began organizing and
negotiating with American Potash & Chemical Corporation (AP&CC) in 1941.
According to a union pamphlet the primary issues were: "Substantial wage raises, adequate
housing, the closed shop and preferential hiring, provision for men taken by military service, the abolition of the scrip system, and the end of racial
discrimination."
The closed shop demand was never conceded. A closed shop is defined as: "A Company operating under
an agreement which specifies the no persons shall be employed who are not members of the
union and that all employees must continue to be members in good standing throughout their
period of employment." (Peterson) Early correspondence between union headquarters
and the local organizer warned against making closed shop a primary issue in early
negotiations, but it was clearly a goal of the union: "In establishing your basis for the strike,
you should do it on the theory that you are trying to better the wages and hours and working conditions
of the men and leave the closed shop more or less in the background until such time as it becomes
necessary to make it the major issue." (Robinson) It is evident from correspondence that the
local organizers' emphasis on closed shop lead to the strike and eventually broke the strike.
"The strike lasted until July 2, 1941, three months." (AAUW) Union correspondence, and
newspaper articles show that this statement is not accurate. The strike was broken, but not over.
On June 27, 1941 AP&CC issued a letter to Trona Workers stating: "The
company has decided to open the gates of the plant Wednesday morning July 2, 1941 for the
re-employment of workers who desire to return to their jobs." The letter also says: "Workers
have the legal right to join, or not to join, or to remain in a union as they may choose." As a result of this letter 500 of 1200
employees returned to work.
The loyal union members considered them
scabs. The union leaders sent a telegram to President Franklin Roosevelt telling him about the
situation and asking that the government take over the plant because "The company has brought
approximately one hundred fifty heavily armed deputies into company owned town." (IUMMSW). Film
footage of the strike shows a flyer stating the strike ended at 12 midnight on Thursday, July
29, 1941.
It is the period between July 2 and July 29, 1941 that caused tensions that stayed with the
community for decades. "During this period close friends became enemies to the extent that some do not speak to each other today." (AAUW) "Wives of working employees,
strolling proudly down the shaded walks on the arms of their husbands, and strikers' wives,
walking equally proudly with their men, exchanged many fiery glances." (San Bernardino Daily Sun)
"Wednesday morning the returning workers gathered in the theatre patio before making
their march through the gates. As they started for the gate, they were met with cheers from their wives and children."
Marching four abreast they moved through the picket line on a path cleared by the deputies amid
the catcalls, boos, and baa's of the pickets...(On Thursday) the workers again made the march
through the picket lines to return to their jobs. The picket line was still at the gate, but there was
another picket line, composed of women and children, who were picketing the pickets."
(Randsburg Times)
Discrimination was a key issue for many Mexicans employed at AP&CC. Mexicans were only
allowed to do the lowest form of physical labor in the Shipping Department. Mexicans were paid
five cents an hour less than the men with whom they worked. They worked 12 hour shifts with
only 15 minutes for lunch. There was no chance for advancement. Mexicans could only live in
one isolated area of town and there were "No Mexicans Allowed" signs posted in some Trona
establishments. A fundraising pamphlet distributed by the Union states: "Another AP&CC tactic
has been that of discriminating against Mexican workers. They are kept at the lowest
pay rates, do the most menial tasks, are not eligible for advancement, and must occupy
quarters that are only seen in substandard slums. Until recently they have been refused
privileges afforded other workers, such as the use of the Trona Club to dance, skate, bowl or play
billiards. Against this form of Jim Crowism the Union has fought unceasingly. The Mexicans have responded by
100% Union membership."
Mr. Quezada's interview agreed with the research materials obtained. His comments added a
dimension that is not found in newspaper articles, books, or union correspondence. This is a man
whose life was dramatically changed by four and half months in 1941. At the time of the strike he
was a young man who had experienced exclusion because of his ethnic heritage, who had been
working hard physical labor for four years, and whose future was one of back-breaking work and
subsistence poverty. The strike opened the doors of opportunity for him. Although he says that
he was mislead by the union leaders to fight for a closed shop, he also says that the strike was worth hardships endured. The strike gave him the opportunity to improve
his life and his standard of living. At the end of his career he was the highest ranking and
highest paid Electrical Design Engineer in Trona.
Laura Quezada, May 1997
Last Update
02/09/2004
|